Gullah Geechee residents strike back at developers with rare Georgia referendum
On a crisp morning, Ire Gene Grovner stood behind his home on Sapelo Island, a knife in hand as he skinned a raccoon stretched across a wooden post. To one side, chickens scratched…
On a crisp morning, Ire Gene Grovner stood
On a crisp morning, Ire Gene Grovner stood behind his home on Sapelo Island, a knife in hand as he skinned a raccoon stretched across a wooden post. To one side, chickens scratched in their pens; to the other, rows of collard greens thrived despite the winter chill. "The meat is good roasted," he said, gesturing toward the greens and the birds. "If you ain't lazy, you can live good here."
Grovner's way of life, rooted in the traditions of the Gullah Geechee people, is at the center of a historic fight. Residents have forced a referendum, only the second of its kind in Georgia's history, to block a zoning change that could open the door to large-scale development on the island. The vote, set for later this month, will determine whether the community can preserve its heritage against outside interests.
The zoning amendment, approved by county commissioners in 2023, would allow for denser housing on a 60-acre parcel owned by a developer who has clashed with locals for years. Opponents argue that the change threatens not only the island's fragile ecosystem but also the cultural fabric of one of the last remaining enclaves of Gullah Geechee descendants, who trace their ancestry to enslaved Africans brought to the Sea Islands centuries ago.
For residents like Grovner, the land is more
For residents like Grovner, the land is more than a home—it's a living connection to their ancestors. "We've been here since before the Civil War," he said. "This isn't just about property; it's about our identity." The referendum campaign has galvanized the community, with volunteers going door-to-door to register voters and spread the word.
If the referendum passes, it would overturn the zoning decision, a rare victory for grassroots activism in a state where such ballot measures are almost unheard of. Legal experts note that the outcome could set a precedent for other communities facing similar pressures from developers. "This is about self-determination," said one supporter. "We're saying we have a say in what happens to our home."
As the vote approaches, the island remains a quiet testament to resilience. Grovner, for his part, has no plans to leave. "I ain't goin' nowhere," he said, a smile breaking through his weathered face. "This is my home, and I'll fight for it."